Transition metal oxides have been considered for electrode materials for many battery systems, including rechargeable (or secondary) lithium batteries. A typical lithium battery consists of a lithium anode, a transition metal oxide cathode, and an organic electrolyte containing lithium ions. It was once believed that the reaction of lithium metal and a transition metal oxide yielded lithium oxide due to reduction of the transition metal oxide. However, emf values were not consistent with thermodynamically expected values [1]. Studies of the expansion in volume of the transition metal oxide structure concluded that lithium was in fact intercalated into the transition metal oxide structure. This work led to further research on intercalation compounds. An intercalation compound, by definition, is a compound that undergoes little or no structural change as a result of the reaction, acting as a host for the other reacting species. Transition metal oxides have the ability to form intercalation hosts for lithium and for this reason have attracted enormous interest as cathodes for rechargeable lithium batteries.
Titanium disulfide was one of the first prototype cathodes for rechargeable lithium batteries. The reaction between lithium metal and titanium disulfide appears to be an ideal intercalation reaction. Through the insertion of up to 1.0 mole Li in 1.0 mole of TiS2, the structure remains stable. The structure maintains hexagonally close-packed sulfur sheets where sulfur is covalently bonded to titanium. This reduces electrostatic cation repulsion allowing for higher intercalation capacity. The stability of the structure promotes excellent cycling performance as lithium is inserted and extracted from atomic vacancies with minimal crystal expansion [1]. However, TiS2 retains a low energy density and insufficient voltage for advanced applications.
LiCoO2 has also been found to have useful properties for lithium batteries. Although the parent compound, CoO2 , possesses a hexagonal structure similar to TiS2, lithiation causes phase transformation to a cubic close-packed structure. This transformation is unfavorable because the Li+ cations do not approach each other as closely as they do in TiS2. Subsequent phase transformations limit further reduction of Co and decrease intercalation capacity. Hence, LiCoO2 only maintains sufficient cycling performance through 0.5 Li intercalation / de-intercalation. However, voltages attained by LiCoO2 have made it commercially successful in the Sony Li-ION cell [1]. Another disadvantage of lithium cobalt oxide is that it is toxic and too expensive for practical large-scale applications.
Manganese oxides have been investigated because of their low cost and non-toxicity. Many crystalline, amorphous, and aerogel forms of manganese oxides have been studied; each one has advantages and disadvantages. Spinel structures of manganese oxides have particularly been investigated for battery applications, but so far they have exhibited lower intercalation capacity and poorer cycling performance than LiCoO2. At voltages of 4 V, cubic spinel LixMn2O4 can sufficiently cycle 0.4 Li. Though cubic spinel may intercalate up to 1.0 Li at 4 V with minimal isotropic expansion of the crystal lattice, dissolution of Mn3+ and oxidation of electrolyte causes gradual capacity loss upon cycling. Upon intercalation of more than 1.0 Li, cell potential drops to 3 V and the cubic symmetry converts to a tetragonal symmetry, which causes a large increase in the volume of the crystal lattice and degrades cycling performance [2].
Amorphous manganese oxides, MnOx, have seen increasing attention in recent years for lithium battery applications. They have shown dramatically higher specific capacities than crystalline forms of MnOx and may serve as high performance cathodes. Synthesis of amorphous manganese oxides has been the focus of a few recent reports [3-5] and capacities in the range of 160-250 mAh/g have been attained. Remarkably, capacities greater than 400 mAh/g were reported by Xu et al for an amorphous manganese dioxide [3]. Cycling performance, however, remains an issue for these high capacity amorphous compounds. Even though the structure of these amorphous compounds is not likely to undergo any global phase transformations during repeated intercalation / de-intercalation, the local structure may undergo gradual changes upon cycling [6]. Such local structure changes may prevent good capacity retention upon insertion and extraction of lithium.
Dopants have been utilized to improve cycling performance and stabilize electrochemically favorable structures. Dopants may be able to improve capacity retention upon cycling if phase transformation is suppressed and volume expansion becomes isotropic and minimized upon lithium insertion. [7]. Potassium has been observed to act as a phase-transforming suppressant, but capacity fading and phase conversion have been found to occur at higher current rates [8]. Vanadium-doping has also been studied recently for a potential pillaring effect in crystalline structures. Most V-doped compounds for battery applications have been synthesized using hydrothermal and sol-gel techniques.
We discuss a novel solution-based oxidation route to the synthesis of amorphous manganese oxides with varying concentrations of vanadium. The synthesis route yields materials with capacity retention upon cycling that is better than that of pure amorphous manganese oxides. The synthesis performed allows increased control over parameters that affect the oxidation state of manganese and the morphology of the powder. We also discuss the effects of vanadium-doping on the electrochemical properties of amorphous manganese oxides as lithium intercalation hosts.
|
Two novel synthesis methods were attempted in order to prepare vanadium-doped manganese oxides. Redox reactions in aqueous solutions were performed to yield powder precipitates of manganese oxide doped with vanadium [9].
Initially, 1 M MnCl2 o4H20 and 1 M VCl3 were added to a solution of 1600 mL of de-ionized water, 1 M NaOCl oxidant, and 1 M NaOH having pH ~11.6 to precipitate a brown fine powder at room temperature. The solution was stirred for 1.5 h in an acidic medium of pH ~3.5. The precipitate was separated from the solution by centrifugation, washed with de-ionized water, and freeze-dried. To test for the presence of any un-reacted manganese or vanadium, additions of NaOH, HCl, and NaOCl were made to the supernatant. Additions of these reagents helped to determine the completion of the reaction and necessary adjustments to the concentrations of the reagents used in the synthesis.
The second synthesis method was similar to the initial solution-based synthesis. 1 M MnCl2 o4H20 was ultra-sonicated with a 0.005 M V2O5 solution and added to 1600 mL of a solution made from de-ionized water, 1 M NaOCl, and enough 1 M NaOH to give a pH of ~12.1. We maintained the combined solution at a pH of ~11.5 as it was stirred for 24 h. The resultant black precipitate of fine particles underwent the same treatment as described above after completion of stirring. The concentrations of the reagents used in the syntheses are shown in Table 1. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) measurements were collected with a Siemens DiffractometerŽ using Cu Ka radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) for structure analysis.
For electrochemical studies, the active material was mixed with 30% carbon black and 10% PTFE powder by weight and dry pressed at 1 metric ton for 30 min. Samples were moved to an Argon-filled glove box after heating at 80 °C for 24 h under vacuum. A four-electrode cell was used with pure lithium metal as reference and counter electrodes and 1 M LiClO4 in propylene carbonate/dimethoxyethane with 1:1 ratio was used as the electrolyte. Cycling tests were performed at a charge / discharge rate of C/5 (1.0 mole of Li reacted with 1.0 mole of Mn per 5 h) on a Maccor potentiostat.
|
[1] M. S. Whittingham, Solid State Ionics, 134, 169, (2000).
[2] M. M. Thackeray, Prog. Solid St. Chem. 25, 1, (1997).
[3] J. J. Xu, A. J. Kisner, B. B. Owens and W. H. Smyrl, Electrochem. & Solid State letters, 1, 1, 1, (1998).
[4] R. Chen, T. Chirayil, P. Zavalij and M. S. Whittingham, Solid State Ionics, 86-88, 1 (1996).
[5] J. J. Xu, A. J. Kisner, B. B. Owens and W. H. Smyrl - Abstract 81, p. 94, The Electrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 97-1, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 4-9, 1997
[6] J. J. Xu, G. Jain, J. Yang, Electrochem. & Solid State letters, (submitted).
[7] M. M. Thackeray, J. of Power Sources, 97-98, 7, (2001).
[8] F. Zhang, K. Zgala, M.S. Whittingham, Electrochem Comm., 2, 445, (2000).
[9] Stadniychuck, Helena, J. of Electrochemical Society. 143, p 1629
[10] F. Leroux and L. F. Nazar, Solid State Ionics, 100, 103 (1997).
[11] A. I. Palos, M. Anne and P. Strobel, Solid State Ionics, 138, 203 (2001).
[12] P. Liu, J. Zhang, J.A. Turner, J. Power Sources, 92, 204, (2001).
[13] T. Ohzuku, J. Kato, K. Sawai & T. Hirai, J. Electrochem. Soc., 137, 3, 769 (1990)
[14] T. Ohzuku, M. Kitagawa & T. Hirai, J. Electrochem. Soc., 137, 3, 769 (1990).
|